Here are the 2022 Pac-12 standings.
So we know what each team achieved, but how did they perform? To answer that, here are the Yards Per Play (YPP), Yards Per Play Allowed (YPA) and Net Yards Per Play (Net) numbers for each Pac-12 team. This includes conference play only, with the championship game not included. The teams are sorted by Net YPP with conference rank in parentheses.
College football teams play either eight or nine conference games. Consequently, their record in such a small sample may not be indicative of their quality of play. A few fortuitous bounces here or there can be the difference between another ho-hum campaign or a special season. Randomness and other factors outside of our perception play a role in determining the standings. It would be fantastic if college football teams played 100 or even 1000 games. Then we could have a better idea about which teams were really the best. Alas, players would miss too much class time, their bodies would be battered beyond recognition, and I would never leave the couch. As it is, we have to make do with the handful of games teams do play. In those games, we can learn a lot from a team’s YPP. Since 2005, I have collected YPP data for every conference. I use conference games only because teams play such divergent non-conference schedules and the teams within a conference tend to be of similar quality. By running a regression analysis between a team’s Net YPP (the difference between their Yards Per Play and Yards Per Play Allowed) and their conference winning percentage, we can see if Net YPP is a decent predictor of a team’s record. Spoiler alert. It is. For the statistically inclined, the correlation coefficient between a team’s Net YPP in conference play and their conference record is around .66. Since Net YPP is a solid predictor of a team’s conference record, we can use it to identify which teams had a significant disparity between their conference record as predicted by Net YPP and their actual conference record. I used a difference of .200 between predicted and actual winning percentage as the threshold for ‘significant’. Why .200? It is a little arbitrary, but .200 corresponds to a difference of 1.6 games over an eight game conference schedule and 1.8 games over a nine game one. Over or under-performing by more than a game and a half in a small sample seems significant to me. In the 2022 season, which teams in the Pac-12 met this threshold? Here are Pac-12 teams sorted by performance over what would be expected from their Net YPP numbers.
Southern Cal significantly overachieved relative to their YPP numbers while Arizona and Cal underachieved. Southern Cal was 4-1 in one-score conference games, but the biggest difference between their actual and expected record was probably their absurd turnover margin. The Trojans committed just four turnovers in their nine regular season Pac-12 games and their in-conference turnover margin of +14 was tops in the league. Meanwhile, the Cal Bears finished 1-4 in one-score conference games, dooming them to a third consecutive losing season. Arizona actually finished 2-1 in one-score conference games and posted the league's best per play offense. So why was there such a disconnect between their actual and expected record? Its kind of a mystery. The Wildcats had a negative in-conference turnover margin (-6), but it wasn't especially bad. They converted less than half their fourth downs in conference play (seven of fifteen), but that percentage is hardly terrible. Similarly, Pac-12 opponents converted more than half their fourth down attempts against the Wildcats, but they weren't exceptional (nine of sixteen). The little things conspired against the Wildcats and as we'll see in a moment, their conference record was historical, considering how well their offense played.
In 2010, Chip Kelly led the Oregon Ducks to the BCS Championship Game with an offense that led the Pac-10 by averaging 6.62 yards per play in conference action. Twelve seasons later, his 2022 UCLA team averaged 7.09 yards per play. That number was only good for fourth place! The 2022 Pac-12 featured quite a few exceptional offenses. In fact, it was the first BCS/Power Five conference to have four teams average north of seven yards per in conference play.
I mentioned a few lines up that Arizona's conference record was an historical outlier, at least relative to their offensive output. Here's what I mean. Since 2005, 48 teams have averaged at least seven yards per play over the course of their conference schedule. The other 47 teams combined to finish 323-65 in their respective leagues. That's roughly seven and a half wins in a nine-game conference schedule like the Pac-12 currently plays. Arizona finished 3-6 and in the process became just the sixth team to finish .500 or worse in conference play while averaging at least seven yards per play. They also became just the second to finish with a losing record.
Does Arizona have another leap in them in 2023? They quintupled their win total in 2022 and played an exciting brand of football. Their leading receiver transferred to Southern Cal, but their starting quarterback and a second thousand yard receiver are back. Arizona is probably not winning the Pac-12 in 2023 or in the near future, but if you like your horses dark, you could do a lot worse than the team in Tucson.